{"id":166550,"date":"2025-01-20T16:33:23","date_gmt":"2025-01-20T15:33:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/literatur\/muscle-density-is-an-independent-risk-factor-of-second-hip-fracture-a-prospective-cohort-study-2\/"},"modified":"2025-01-20T16:33:24","modified_gmt":"2025-01-20T15:33:24","slug":"muscle-density-is-an-independent-risk-factor-of-second-hip-fracture-a-prospective-cohort-study-2","status":"publish","type":"literatur","link":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/literature\/muscle-density-is-an-independent-risk-factor-of-second-hip-fracture-a-prospective-cohort-study-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Muscle density is an independent risk factor of second hip fracture: a  prospective cohort study."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BACKGROUND: Patients with a first hip fracture are at high risk of fracturing  their other hip. Despite this, preventive therapy is often not given. Because  little is known about specific risk factors of a second hip fracture, we  investigated the association with areal bone mineral density (aBMD), muscle size,  and density. We also investigated whether muscle parameters predict the risk of a  contralateral fracture independently of aBMD. METHODS: Three groups were  included, one without hip fracture (a subcohort of the China Action on Spine and  Hip Status study), one with a first, and one with a second hip fracture. Subjects  with fractures were recruited from the longitudinal Chinese Second Hip Fracture  Evaluation (CSHFE). Computed tomography scans of CSHFE patients, which were  obtained immediately following their first fracture, were used to measure  cross-sectional area and density of the gluteus maximus (G.MaxM) and gluteus  medius and minimus (G.Med\/MinM) muscles. Computed tomography X-ray absorptiometry  was used to measure aBMD of the contralateral femur. Median follow-up time to  second fracture was 4.5 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to  compute hazard ratios (HR) of second hip fracture risk in subjects with a first  hip fracture. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to compare odds ratios  (OR) for the risk of a first and second hip fracture. RESULTS: Three hundred and  one participants (68.4 +\/- 6.1 years, 64% female) without and 302 participants  (74.6 +\/- 9.9 years, 71% female) with a first hip fracture were included in the  analysis. Among the latter, 45 (79.2 +\/- 7.1 years) sustained a second hip  fracture. ORs for first hip fracture were significant for aBMD and muscle size  and density. ORs for a second fracture were smaller by a factor of 3 to 4 and no  longer significant for femoral neck (FN) aBMD. HRs for predicting second hip  fracture confirmed the results. G.Med\/MinM density (HR, 1.68; CI, 1.20-2.35) and  intertrochanter aBMD (HR, 1.62; CI, 1.13-2.31) were the most significant. FN aBMD  was not significant. G.Med\/MinM density remained significant for predicting  second hip fracture after adjustment for FN (HR, 1.66; Cl, 1.18-2.30) or total  hip aBMD (HR, 1.50; 95% Cl, 1.04-2.15). CONCLUSIONS: Density of the G.Med\/MinM  muscle is an aBMD independent predictor of the risk of second hip fracture.  Intertrochanteric aBMD is a better predictor of second hip fracture than FN and  total hip aBMD. These results may trigger a paradigm shift in the assessment of  second hip fracture risk and prevention strategies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BACKGROUND: Patients with a first hip fracture are at high risk of fracturing their other hip. Despite this, preventive therapy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"tags":[],"thema":[5924,5866],"produktgruppe":[5825],"literatur_kategorie":[7221],"class_list":["post-166550","literatur","type-literatur","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","thema-clinical-studies","thema-diagnostics-using-leonardo-pqct","produktgruppe-pqct-en","literatur_kategorie-clinical-studies"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/literatur\/166550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/literatur"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/literatur"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/literatur\/166550\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166550"},{"taxonomy":"thema","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thema?post=166550"},{"taxonomy":"produktgruppe","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/produktgruppe?post=166550"},{"taxonomy":"literatur_kategorie","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stratec-med.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/literatur_kategorie?post=166550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}